[ad_1]
The case, involving a decapitated and mutilated body discovered in Bawana in December 2014, led to the arrest of three individuals.
Delhi: Woman murdered, body chopped into several pieces
According to the public prosecutor, the deceased, Manjeet, and the arrested men were drug addicts. Allegedly, the victim’s refusal to share contraband on the day of the incident provoked the accused to commit the murder.
In a recent ruling, judge Dhirendra Rana questioned the prosecution’s claim that all involved parties were consuming contraband, highlighting the absence of such substances in their blood samples and recovered exhibits. The judge also expressed skepticism about the alleged murder weapon, a blade, being used to decapitate and mutilate the victim in a manner exposing chest bones.
The court criticized the investigating officer for neglecting to trace the victim’s head and ignoring the post-mortem report, which indicated post-mortem mutilation and the absence of the heart. It suggested that the crime scene hinted at occult practices, potentially related to human sacrifice, but the IO chose not to investigate this aspect.
Consequently, the court acquitted the trio of murder charges, citing the prosecution’s failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. It characterized the investigation as “shoddy” and accused the IO of protecting the real offender. The judge emphasized the injustice to both the deceased and the accused, who had faced trial since 2015, while the actual killer remained at large.
In response, the court directed the concerned Deputy Commissioner of Police to take appropriate departmental action against the investigating officer.
(With inputs from PTI)
[ad_2]
Source link